Skip to main content

U.S. Sugar Companies Side With Monsanto!

As the GMO debate continues, and more and more consumers are learning the truth about health and environmental concerns related to genetically modified foods, pro-GMO companies and farmers are feeling the pressure to fight back. The good news is: many of them themselves admit that they are losing.“We are losing the online debate,” admitted Idaho sugar beet farmer Duane Grant.
The bad news is that the pro-GMO propaganda is about to increase.

One of these “educational” online campaigns is scheduled for this fall, and the organization is spending $4 million to target moms living in three large urban areas to convince them that GMOs are good for their kids and the planet. If successful, their campaign will be expended nationwide and $30 million will be spent.

Named “A Fresh Look,” the campaign is financed by Amalgamated Sugar Co., Betaseed Incorporated, Western Sugar Cooperative and Wyoming Sugar Company, which grow GMO Roundup Ready sugar beets (RRSB) for sugar production. (Amalgamated produces about 20% of U.S. beet sugar).

The pro-GMO website campaign utilizes inspirational images and messages to attempt to convince mothers that GMOs are a smart choice for to their children. There is no independent research cited, and the majority of claims are sourced from the FDA, the USDA, and WHO – all big government organizations who have strong GMO stances in large part because of the overwhelming amount of pro-GMO lobbying they receive.

Biotechnology companies spent $101.4 million on lobbying in 2015; compared to this, $4 million seems like nothing.
The U.S. beet industry switched to GM technologies as early as 2003; Amalgamated planted first GMO beets in 2006. Duane Grant, chairman of Snake River Sugar Cooperative (which controls Idaho-based Amalgamated Sugar) says that they will never go back to being non-GMO, even in light of a recent consumer backlash.“This company will go out of business before they go back to conventional,” Grant said.
As more and more candy and other processed food companies have begun switching to non-GMO sugar beets and sugar cane, GMO sugar beet farmers are being left out in the cold. It has been estimated that over 90 percent of sugar beets grown in the U.S. are GMO, but many farmers are being forced to change their ways due to lack of market demand.

Because U.S. sugar makers switched to GMO sugar beets almost two decades ago (even though they were briefly stopped in 2010),  there is almost no organic sugar being made in the U.S. – only roughly 2%. The only U.S. company that produces organic sugar is Florida Crystals (made from organic evaporated cane juice). The majority of organic sugar is imported cane sugar.“I’m not hearing about any big efforts by American producers to go into organic,” said economist Jack Roney. “In developing countries, it’s kind of easier to do organic because they can’t afford herbicides or pesticides.”

A U.S. non-GMO beet sugar is virtually non-existent.“We do not yet have a beet sugar that is Non-GMO Project verified,” said Megan Westgate, executive director of Non-GMO Project.
 As it stands today, it does not look as we will see organic beet sugar in the U.S. The consumers are demanding non-GMO sugar, but the sugar companies are refusing to ever switch.

The pro-GMO propaganda campaign is just another sign that they are losing.
Amalgamated Sugar’s president John McCreedy said the company lost at least 15% of their customers to other organic sweeteners available.
It’s too bad that instead of switching over, they are trying to force their agenda down people’s throats by spending millions on a PR campaign using carefully picked psychological tools, but no independent science to back their claims.

(If you want to avoid GMO beet sugar, avoid buying non-organic foods that contain it, usually under the simple yet deceptive name “sugar” on the back of the package, or buy products with cane sugar instead).

Original Report by Yelena Sukhoterina

Popular posts from this blog

US GMO Potatoes Sold As Processed Food In Australia

GM potatoes, grown in the US, can now be imported and sold as processed food in Australia. Simplot, the developer of the GM potato, is a large multinational with brands.

Australian regulators don’t test, don’t require peer-reviewed studies and never refuse GM food applications
Peer-reviewed evidence of damage from eating GM dismissed by a regulator.

FSANZ have ignored scientists warnings of potential harm. The Centre for Integrated Research in Biosafety (INBI) “predicted that dsRNA (i.e. RNAi) could be transmitted to humans through food, and that dsRNA would be sufficiently resistant to cooking and normal stomach pHs to potentially be taken up by cells or circulated through blood.

GM foods are being tested on us

You are probably eating GM food every day.

Currently, GM crops including soy, corn, canola, sugar beet and cotton, are processed into ingredients that avoid labeling in Australia. The GM potato is different. It is a whole food that will contain GM DNA and protein.
Will Simplot, the c…

Mayflower, Arkansas, Oil Spill

Under-Reported Environmental Disasters

Mayflower, Arkansas, Oil Spill

On March 29, 2013, the 65-year-old ExxonMobil Pegasus pipeline ruptured beneath a subdivision in Mayflower, Arkansas, soaking lawns and streets with an estimated 210,000 gallons of heavy toxic tar sands crude. For Mayflower's 2,200 residents, the existence of a pipeline running under their homes (and partially through the watershed that provides water to 400,000 people) came as a shock.

Considered a "major spill" by the EPA, it sickened hundreds of residents and exposed them to known carcinogens like benzene and to hydrogen sulfide, which causes respiratory illnesses.

Who's Responsible

ExxonMobil. The Pegasus pipeline was built to carry lighter oil north from the Gulf Coast. In 2006 it was repurposed to carry the far heavier bitumen south from Canada. Bitumen is so thick that it has to be heated and diluted with gas in order to flow properly. In November, PHMSA proposed fining ExxonMobil $2.6 million…

Radiation Testing on Humans in United States Widespread!

The health ramifications of human testing are unknown
Radiation Survey: Procedures
Three members of Congress are demanding answers after a St. Louis scholar’s new book revealed details of how the U.S. government sprayed, injected and fed radiation and other dangerous materials to countless people in secret Cold War-era testing. The health ramifications of the tests are unknown. Lisa Martino-Taylor, an associate professor of sociology at St. Louis Community College who wrote “Behind the Fog: How the U.S. Cold War Radiological Weapons Program Exposed Innocent Americans,” acknowledged that tracing diseases like cancer to specific causes is difficult. But three congressmen who represent areas where testing occurred — Democrats William Lacy Clay of Missouri, Brad Sherman of California and Jim Cooper of Tennessee — said they were outraged by the revelations. Martino-Taylor used Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain previously unreleased documents, including army records. She also reviewe…