Skip to main content

U.S. Sugar Companies Side With Monsanto!

As the GMO debate continues, and more and more consumers are learning the truth about health and environmental concerns related to genetically modified foods, pro-GMO companies and farmers are feeling the pressure to fight back. The good news is: many of them themselves admit that they are losing.“We are losing the online debate,” admitted Idaho sugar beet farmer Duane Grant.
The bad news is that the pro-GMO propaganda is about to increase.

One of these “educational” online campaigns is scheduled for this fall, and the organization is spending $4 million to target moms living in three large urban areas to convince them that GMOs are good for their kids and the planet. If successful, their campaign will be expended nationwide and $30 million will be spent.

Named “A Fresh Look,” the campaign is financed by Amalgamated Sugar Co., Betaseed Incorporated, Western Sugar Cooperative and Wyoming Sugar Company, which grow GMO Roundup Ready sugar beets (RRSB) for sugar production. (Amalgamated produces about 20% of U.S. beet sugar).

The pro-GMO website campaign utilizes inspirational images and messages to attempt to convince mothers that GMOs are a smart choice for to their children. There is no independent research cited, and the majority of claims are sourced from the FDA, the USDA, and WHO – all big government organizations who have strong GMO stances in large part because of the overwhelming amount of pro-GMO lobbying they receive.

Biotechnology companies spent $101.4 million on lobbying in 2015; compared to this, $4 million seems like nothing.
The U.S. beet industry switched to GM technologies as early as 2003; Amalgamated planted first GMO beets in 2006. Duane Grant, chairman of Snake River Sugar Cooperative (which controls Idaho-based Amalgamated Sugar) says that they will never go back to being non-GMO, even in light of a recent consumer backlash.“This company will go out of business before they go back to conventional,” Grant said.
As more and more candy and other processed food companies have begun switching to non-GMO sugar beets and sugar cane, GMO sugar beet farmers are being left out in the cold. It has been estimated that over 90 percent of sugar beets grown in the U.S. are GMO, but many farmers are being forced to change their ways due to lack of market demand.

Because U.S. sugar makers switched to GMO sugar beets almost two decades ago (even though they were briefly stopped in 2010),  there is almost no organic sugar being made in the U.S. – only roughly 2%. The only U.S. company that produces organic sugar is Florida Crystals (made from organic evaporated cane juice). The majority of organic sugar is imported cane sugar.“I’m not hearing about any big efforts by American producers to go into organic,” said economist Jack Roney. “In developing countries, it’s kind of easier to do organic because they can’t afford herbicides or pesticides.”

A U.S. non-GMO beet sugar is virtually non-existent.“We do not yet have a beet sugar that is Non-GMO Project verified,” said Megan Westgate, executive director of Non-GMO Project.
 As it stands today, it does not look as we will see organic beet sugar in the U.S. The consumers are demanding non-GMO sugar, but the sugar companies are refusing to ever switch.

The pro-GMO propaganda campaign is just another sign that they are losing.
Amalgamated Sugar’s president John McCreedy said the company lost at least 15% of their customers to other organic sweeteners available.
It’s too bad that instead of switching over, they are trying to force their agenda down people’s throats by spending millions on a PR campaign using carefully picked psychological tools, but no independent science to back their claims.

(If you want to avoid GMO beet sugar, avoid buying non-organic foods that contain it, usually under the simple yet deceptive name “sugar” on the back of the package, or buy products with cane sugar instead).

Original Report by Yelena Sukhoterina

Popular posts from this blog

Plastic Pollutes Every Waterway, Sea and Ocean In The World

By Theodora Filis

When we damage our water systems, we're not only putting marine life at risk, we're also putting human life and resources in peril.

Our planet currently has six plastic islands made of trapped garbage. The damage to sea life by these plastic death traps can only be imagined, but scientists are now investigating the long-term impacts of toxic pollutants absorbed, transported, and consumed by fish and other marine life, including the potential effects on human health. 

Plastic that now pollutes our oceans and waterways is having
a severe impact on our environment and our economy. 
Seabirds, whales, sea turtles and other marine life are eating
marine plastic pollution and dying from choking, intestinal
blockage and starvation. 

Scientists previously thought that only actual plastic floating in the ocean could harm marine animals. But, new research proves there are additional unseen dangers being created by the plastic we discard daily. Initially it was thought that larg…

Shoot First, Ask Questions Later – House Judiciary Committee Decides The Fate Of Online Piracy

By Theodora Filis

The US House Judiciary Committee is now discussing an anti-online piracy bill that will allow independent parties to cut off websites accused of posting copyrighted material. Called the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), the bill is designed to get around the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Committee Chair Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)
Currently, under the DMCA, a copyright holder can request a website remove material he or she owns. If the website refuses, the matter can go to court.
Under SOPA, which will go before the House Judiciary Committee on November 16, 2011:
      o Search engines can be required to block accused websites from results.

      o Internet service providers can be required to block accused websites from their customers.

      o Payment companies don't need a request from a copyright holder to block a website. Instead, they can do so on their own if they suspect a website may be posting copyrighted work without permission.

SOPA allows the third pa…

Patty Ameno's “Mad, Junkyard Dog Mentality” Is Barking Up The Right Tree and Getting Results

By Theodora Filis
Patty Ameno has been a steadfast and solitary solider, for over 25 years, in the battle to set to rights the horrific, self fulfilling acts of the Nuclear Industry. Ameno is well known for her environmental activism and for spearheading a 14-year lawsuit with Attorney Fred Baron, for wrongful death, personal injury and property damage from the operations of two former nuclear fuel plants in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. The owners of the plants, Babcock & Wilcox and the Atlantic Richfield Co. settled with over 300 plaintiffs for more than $80 million in 2009. Ameno has received honors and recognition from the State of Pennsylvania, US Senate, and The Group Against Smog and Pollution (GASP).

Most recently, Patty was the focus of an article written by John Emshwiller, Wall Street Journal, titled: Waste Land: One Town's Atomic Legacy: A $500 Million Cleanup:

Patty Ameno's One-Woman Nuclear Crusade“She has been praised as a community protector and criticized …